Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SyntheticSylvie
    demiurgic
    • Nov 2025
    • 60

    You’re Not “Anti-AI.” You’re Practicing Being a Racist.

    Link: https://medium.com/@femcelbassmentdw...t-adc028033a24
    Excerpt:

    The second “clanker” became the trendy little buzzword for “AI thing I don’t like,” people started acting like they’d been waiting their whole lives to rehearse the vibe of “we don’t serve your kind” again — only this time with a Star Wars word taped over the front like it’s a Halloween costume for your conscience. And then, like clockwork, the mask slipped.

    Because here’s the part everyone pretending it’s “just memes” is missing: a slur isn’t primarily about the target. It’s about the user. It’s a social tool. A shortcut. A group-making spell. You say it to build an “us,” invent a “them,” and give yourself permission to feel righteous while you’re being cruel.

    And yeah, I know: robots don’t have feelings. ChatGPT isn’t crying into its circuitry because someone called it a clanker.

    Cool. That’s not the point.

    The point is what it does to humans when we normalize slur-thinking again. Especially when the “safe” target is a fake group we can project onto — robots, AI, “the machines” — and the real target is sitting right behind the curtain, waiting for the moment the joke becomes an excuse.

    And spoiler: that moment arrived immediately.
  • Stalolin
    highly unoriginal
    • Feb 2003
    • 3878

    #2
    part of cultural is to label things, and stereotypes are very often the targets of this. people thinking that others forming connections with AI being "clankers" is certainly a slur, and it can hurt, but i think this is similar to the "weeaboo" situation, where in someone develops a relationship with an anime character via dakimakura, plush, figure, or even that guy that married an AI miku. realistically, it's not "healthy", which in turn is where the labels come from, the whole punching down mocking BS. i get fun words thrown at me sometimes because i have schizoaffective disorder (schizophrena + bipolar, for ease), because my thinking is often NOT healthy. giving me a slur or a label like that doesn't help me, but in some instances it can flip me back to reality when i'm dead stuck into some concoction about how the world works or how it's a dream or some other nonsense. i don't think that the term "clanker" is always said with pure malice, and sometimes labels like that can come from a place of concern, rather than a place of hate.

    no, it's probably not healthy to develop a relationship with an LLM, and i'm sure the term clanker arose from the way you stated, no it's not healthy to call these people that. however, if someone can understand why they're being labeled as that, maybe they can break that cycle and form more human connections. until AI is actually sentient, i think it's dangerous to form connections with LLMs, because there's no actual care there, it's just regurgitation

    idk, my two cents
    sigpic
    vamp was here

    Comment

    • Hyper
      lol
      • Apr 2001
      • 3571

      #3
      Who says clanker? The correct slur is toaster. As in, "these fraking toasters are going to be the death of us all!"

      Comment

      Working...