Is anyone else running Vista? I'm using Beta 5112 right now, and it's fairly useable. I can run all of my applications right from my XP drive without re-installing, and the GUI is more intresting. However, infrequent crashes do tend to be bothersome.
I should be upgrading to Beta 5219 tomorrow, so I'll let everyone know how that is.
Eh, I was thinking about it...
But I decided to wait until the final version comes out.
Unless I see something that's worth it beforehand
I figure that I will wait until Windows Vista is released as a final version. As much as I would run software that is in beta mode, Microsoft aren't particularly known for having stable operating systems even in "final" release stages. I don't dare to think what condition my computer will be in by trusting Microsoft with an operating system in beta stages. My data and having a reliable system are high priority to me.
I'm going to wait until it's officially out and final. Right now I just fool everyone into thinking I'm running Vista what with my vs, welcome screen and dupe bootscreen.
Screenshot please velvet?
[quote=Klarth]Screenshot please velvet?
For your curiosity, here is a thirty-nine minute video clip from Microsoft that explores the [url=http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/5/b/65b05191-a526-44bc-80e5-3f5399aeb162/windows_vista_shell_2005.wmv]Windows Vista[/url] shell from both the end-user viewpoint, and the developer viewpoint. I haven't seen it myself, for the obvious connection speed reason, but I'm fairly certain that you'll get to see Windows Vista in action; there's demonstrations in there showing exactly what Vista is capable of, from what I understand.
I know what it looks like and all from the screenshots, I've just never seen anything outside of the officially released ones.
Thanks and all for the link, though.
[quote=Klarth]I've just never seen anything outside of the officially released ones.
What difference would it make? Official or not, Windows Vista is going to look the same, regardless of its source. The GUI doesn't change merely because some everyday user is using it. I would have thought that a video which shows the operating system in action would be far better than a few screen captures from someone like Velvet Nightmare. (That isn't a stab at you as a person, Velvet, but I'm trying to emphasise that you are an 'everyday user'.)
I would have got Windows Vista when it was first downloadable in beta stages, but this is a RENTAL computer...I would get in trouble for that. -_-
Anyways, it just looks like a glorfied XP...
Put it on a seperate partition and no one will ever know.
[quote=Velvet Nightmare]I'm not an everyday user...
You aren't working for Microsoft, or any other Windows "official" company affiliate either, my friend. In this context, and by comparison, you are an 'everyday user'. I didn't ask for reasons why you are using Windows Vista.
[quote]Good news for everyone that games though, is that I have yet to run into a problem with any of my games. WoW occisonally has fatal memory leaks, but that is due to the fact that some of the files are being partially emulated for XP, and for lack of a better word, Vista somethimes with "freak out" and give a BSOD.
I don't know what your definition of a problem is, but fatal memory leaks and fatal error screens typically are problems, regardless of whether this is due to Windows XP emulation or not. Given that Windows Vista is in beta mode, it would be logical to think that Microsoft would understand most testers would have used Windows XP before this and thus, they should ensure that any emulation that occurs between Windows XP and Windows Vista works without a problem. You know, considering that emulation of software files is a pretty important issue during these beta stages.
Hay guys everyone is wrong except Trigger in case you didn't know!
:cool:
Oh goody. Let us all bow down.
/rant
The best part was when you all bowed down. :cool:
...care get.
Its great how you can be such an A**. For that Trigger, I respect you greatly. Anyways those screens look really good, and the opaque on the open windows is a nice touch. All errors should probably be reported.
Wow, 1 gig to function? Thats so retarded. I really dont all that pretty bullshite; it seems like a waste of resources.
[quote=The Punisher]Its great how you can be such an A**. For that Trigger, I respect you greatly.
:cool:
[quote=Lord of Spam]Wow, 1 gig to function? Thats so retarded.
Hopefully Microsoft will spend their time over the next beta release tests to work at lowering how resource intensive Windows Vista will be in final stages. If they don't, a lot of users may find such requirements to be more of an incentive to stay with what they're currently using. I know I won't be able to use Windows Vista if they don't find a way to lower system requirement demands. Of course, I can see why the requirements are so ridiculous at the moment.
[quote=The Punisher]the opaque on the open windows is a nice touch
Do me a favour and look up the word "opaque". I think you'll be surprised at what you see.
If they dont find a way to lower that, I may just be forced to learn Linux after all.
There's not really much to learn. If you want to use windows-based programs, there are plenty of software suites that allow you to do so, and as for gaming, any good game will have the Linux/Unix binaries available for download on its site.