I actually look forward to seeing Abomination look like a '[URL="http://cardboardmonocle.com/blog/fxsuits/goomba.jpg"]Goomba[/URL]'.
[youtube=ZmYIdzgvOgo&hl]ZmYIdzgvOgo&hl[/youtube]
[youtube=_qTJ7fhPsmE&hl]_qTJ7fhPsmE&hl=en[/youtube]
[youtube=kzVNa0gH3Yg&hl]kzVNa0gH3Yg&hl[/youtube]
let's hope it's better than the first!
I think I'm one of the few who actually liked the first, not really as what I would envision of a Hulk movie, but ok, none the less.
Anyway, I'm really liking a lot of what I've been seeing of the new Hulk and I really enjoy Norton and looks much more around the lines of what I would think a Hulk movie should be.
Make a thread about an interesting movie for a change. I've seen this story done enough. I doubt anyone's going to get me more interested in this guy's life. Boring.
I'm sure it'll be better than the last one though. gawd-awful.
So theyre remaking movies that came out just 5 years ago now? Dosent look that interesting.
The only reason we have another Hulk, is to 1) make up for that gawdawful mess that happened on the silver screen 5 years ago. And 2) it's to tie in with other-upcoming films; such as the Avengers, Captain America, Thor, and Iron Man 2. Hence the Iron Man cameo in this Hulk.
And money.
[IMG]http://www.thebitbag.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/im_hulkbuster2.jpg[/IMG]
HulkBuster suit, as seen in the Iron Man vg/film adaptation. I heard of the Stark cameo, for The Incredible Hulk. But-
could it be possible that his couterpart, Iron Man also gets a few minutes of air time against/with the jade behemoth?
I'm usually not into the super hero movies, but I am looking forward to this. Edward Norton is an amazing actor. One of my favorites.
I didn't see the first one and now I don't have to! I'm glad they're doing an established-character story this time around instead of another origins one. I guess they decided to use the first movie as leverage for an origins story to avoid making a remake.
[quote=Fate;852553][COLOR=skyblue]I didn't see the first one and now I don't have to! I'm glad they're doing an established-character story this time around instead of another origins one. I guess they decided to use the first movie as leverage for an origins story to avoid making a remake.[/COLOR]
They didn't necessarily use the previous 'Hulk' flick for an origins peices. This refurbished installment is basically a series reboot (same with the new line of Batman films) from that garbage, with minor 'origin' backplot..
Com'on Fate, no one wants to remember the Hulk as "Shrek on steroids". Do they?
I think I was one of the few that liked the hulk movie , but I only liked it probably because I was 13 and the hulk had cool powers. Back then the hulk looked real to me , but I just googled a the hulk image and he does look like a cartoon. You think the could have made a hulk like the one now 5 years ago ?
[quote=oswaldothelegend;852627]I think I was one of the few that liked the hulk movie , but I only liked it probably because I was 13 and the hulk had cool powers. Back then the hulk looked real to me , but I just googled a the hulk image and he does look like a cartoon. You think the could have made a hulk like the one now 5 years ago ?
Had they of used Square Pictures' studios (the crew behind "Spirits Within"), then yes; we'd have a much sexayer Hulk. The technology and know-how behind CGI animation has always been there since day one of the the production of that garbage..
Didnt see the first one. Don't understand why people are excited as they are to see this one either.
"After the 2003 film Hulk, Marvel Studios reacquired the rights to the character, and writer Zak Penn began work on a reboot that would be closer to the comics and the television series"
The 2003 film was not by Marvel Studios and also cannot be properly placed into the Marvel Studios story universe
Thanks for repeating my wiki reference..
stupid character, stupid concept, gonna suck.
Didn't enjoy the first one, this one looks pretty decent though! So I'm probably going to end up watching it.
[quote=Fate;853098][COLOR=skyblue]Hulk really hasn't been the idiot he's been portrayed as for a long while now. Him and Banner have merged into an intelligent being since World War Hulk. Whether if it was actually before that I wouldn't know.[/COLOR]
Since the 80's- [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_versions_of_Hulk"]Gray Hulk[/URL].
And then there's [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hulk"]Red Hulk[/URL], which appears to be tactically intelligent.
Red Hulk isn't Banner and the 80s sucked. What I'm talking about is a complete merger between Banner and Hulk in terms of strength and intelligence.
Yeah, I read that far into 'World War Hulk'. I haven't picked up a graphic novel or single issue in years, which if I do so happen to read into any comic universe; it's either online in a plot synopsis or I download the issues.
I knew Red Hulk wasn't Banner, I'm not oblivious to marketing gimics. Marvel is easy to read when they advertise/introduce a new villain/adversary.
The 80's did suck, ideas then were becoming more and more flawed with this New Wave scene, as seen apparent by most of the uniforms and outfits worn by the X-Men.
Goomba!!
[IMG]http://incrediblehulk.marvel.com/wallpapers/wall6_1024.jpg[/IMG]
when are they going to make a movie about red venom?
idk, but they should. red venom was always better than black venom
Red Venom > Carnage?
Yeah, red venom is way better than carnage.
I liked undead Venom, better than any of other symbiote created. He ate Brock's corpse and just continued to inhabit the host's bones..
That's dedication.
I'll just leave [URL="http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/articles/4370.asp"]this[/URL] to the open air..
Man, that's pretty cool! I like how Marvel is adding some sort of continuity between all its new movies.
I'll just wait it out until tomorrow, to actually see if all these crossover rumors will fly.
i saw hulk last night, and, to be honest... it was brilliant... a MASSIVE improvement on the 1st one. and yes there are a cameo's, and a significant 1 towards the end, but i'm not givin anythin big away, but for those who have seen it, that scene in the bar at the end gave me chills lol, cant wait to see where that leads... hmmm... i wonder... ? lol
what did every1 else think??
SPOILER:
[COLOR="DimGray"]no, Tony Stark (Freddie Price Jr) come in and talks to General Ross about "putting a team together", which i'm guessin will lead to a New Avengers movie or somethin like that... especially after Nick Fury's cameo at the of Iron Man[/COLOR]
Oh, yeah. I think that's been known for awhile.
Yeah, I dug that up months ago-
Just saw it. It was really good. The only real complaint I have is the gay *** taxi driver bit. Not funny.
Story was good. Great use of characters. Action was sweet too. I was suprised the action never reached overkill considering a huge green guy can pretty much do what he wants.
The Tony Stark cameo at the end was awesome but I Wolverine was no where to be seen. I didn't stay till after the credits as my bladder was trembling so maybe he crops up there but I doubt it.
The in jokes were great too; The purple shorts, original 70s actor, "Hulk smash".
Movie. Rocked. Go see it. Edward Norton does a great job.
[quote]Lou Ferrigno who played the Hulk in the television series cameos as a Security Guard.
Go figure, Lou played that role in the 2003 release of Hulk. Reprise get-
just saw the movie , it kicks ***. Norton did a great job , I didn't think he was going to be good because of the way I saw him in the previews , but he definitely pulls it off.
I thought captain America was going to make an appearance !? I saw G4 and they interviewed that guy that was all over the place about the hulk movie , I don't remember his name. He said that in Iron man you see captain Americas shield , and that in the Incredible Hulk movie you would actually see captain America , and I Never saw him . I stayed after the credits and there was no scene , the screen just went blank , I was so dissapointed. :(
The movie was badass so no complaints here I freaking got a huge boner when I saw Tony Stark ! Can't wait to see everyone together on the big screen !
yeah i know its been known for a while, but i thought it'd be one of those pointless, comedy camoes, didnt think it would have any significance...
did anyine else think "Mr Blue" was gonna be Reed Richards? lol
oh and Bebop what are u on about? "gettin your facts right"? whats not right about what i said??
Hah, oh man I saw this last night and I was pretty pleased with it. Go see it. If only to see Tony Stark at the end lol.
It exceeded my expectations, I was expecting it to be pretty good, but I really enjoyed it, quite a bit. Also, found this out:
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news08/080611i.php
[Quote]Now in an interview with Collider, he reveals that he intends for the eventual Blu-ray and DVD release film to contain all that cut footage - a total of 70 minutes of footage not included in the final theatrical cut including two scenes shown in the trailers that definitely didn't make the final version of the film.
One of those scenes includes the Captain America cameo says Judao. Whilst the serum is mentioned frequently throughout the film, the crew shot a whole quite dark sequence where Bruce Banner travels to the Arctic Circle and meets up with Captain America.
Not sure how official this is or if will be in the first DVD release or a double dip in the future, but 70 minutes? That's almost another film length worth of new stuff.
Sounds like BS to me. But who knows.
Just saw it earlier lastnight, ****in' loved ever minute of it-
Also noticed three subtle hints towards future encounters and cameos in the upcoming sequel/s:
Spoilers:
[spoiler]1) Dr. Reinstein's name is implicated on the cryo-canister holding the Super Soldier serum, which Gen. Ross has administered to Blonsky. (Josef) Reinstein induced the serum originally upon Steve Rogers (Captain America).
2) Professor Samuel Sterns, after finalizing the Gama Pulse procedure to Blonsky; is himself injured by Blonsky and also affected by the GP radiation/Banner's blood. Thus creating The Leader.
Subtle hint being; "as Blonsky mutates into a hideous beast, he knocks Sterns aside and an irradiated sample of Banner's blood-derivative drips into an open wound on Sterns temple, causing his cranium to mutate and expand".
3) David Bruce Banner ends the film, traveling to Bella Coola, British Columbia.. Canada. Being the first related area where he first encounters Wolverine. (Incredible Hulk issue # 180-181).[/spoiler]
i cant see that Captain America thing being true, they wouldn't introduce such a significant character in the Marvel Universe with a cameo. Also, he would take a lot of explainin and without that, most people wouldn't know who he is, so yeah i think its BS.
If there's one character people know about it's Captain America.
[quote=omegga;854919]i cant see that Captain America thing being true, they wouldn't introduce such a significant character in the Marvel Universe with a cameo. Also, he would take a lot of explainin and without that, most people wouldn't know who he is, so yeah i think its BS.
You're an idiot-
Captain America is one of seven Avengers to prove formidable in a battle against the Hulk, the others being; Thor, Iron Man, Henry Pym, Spider-Man, Wolverine, and Namor.
Continuity-wise, no; Cap probably wouldn't cameo in the direct sequel. And that's only because of the time period in which this Hulk film takes place. Being that-
Captain America should be somewhere in the Nothrt Atlantic, frozen in a glacier.
The Hulk entered the Avengers, and left before the original Captain America joined ranks.
There is a planned Captain America film, before the release of the final tie-in of this crossover series for The Avengers.
[quote]In August 2006, Marvel Entertainment's "Marvel Studios Overview Presentation" listed the Avengers as a property under development for a feature film, with Zak Penn as screenwriter. In a May 5, 2008, report to shareholders, Marvel Entertainment announced the release dates for two planned Avenger movies. The First Avenger: Captain America (working title) is scheduled for May 6, 2011, followed by the The Avengers, scheduled for July 2011.
The first reference in film to the Avengers is in Iron Man (2008), in a post-credits scene of Nick Fury (played by Samuel L. Jackson) speaking with Tony Stark about the "Avenger Initiative". Subsequently in The Incredible Hulk , Tony Stark briefly speaks with General Thunderbolt Ross discussing the formation of a team.
According to Yahoo movies "Plans are for The Avengers to assemble in their own movie in 2011. "
See moron-
your juvenile opinions are B/S.
[quote=Old_Snake;854718]It exceeded my expectations, I was expecting it to be pretty good, but I really enjoyed it, quite a bit. Also, found this out:
[URL]http://www.darkhorizons.com/news08/080611i.php[/URL]
Not sure how official this is or if will be in the first DVD release or a double dip in the future, but 70 minutes? That's almost another film length worth of new stuff.
[quote=Vampiro V. Empire;854723]Sounds like BS to me. But who knows.
Yep-
smells like total BS to me, aswell.
Kinda makes [URL="http://www.hemmy.net/images/animals/doghulk.jpg"]this[/URL] seem plausible..
Cap' has been planned for a reboot since the late 90's. What's not to understand about him possibly making a cameo in the upcoming Hulk sequel?
I've lined it out as clear as day, for you to try and comprehend with your little (female?) brain.
dude, seriously, i made a simple point and you've blown it WAY out of proportion...
all i was saying, is that a character like Cap takes a lot of explainin to anyone who doesnt follow Marvel (ie, the majority of people who are going to see the Incredible Hulk movie) so to give him a cameo in the main feature wouldnt make sense as the majority of the audience wouldn't understand whats happenin...
that make sense...? or are you going to get even more pedantic and continue talking about him still being frozen... the films are no where near as accurate as the comics... i didnt even mention who could take on the hulk, yeah i know - i've read the avengers and the new avengers (and the ultimates) but i dont see why you brought that up because the film is based around the Abomination, and has nothin to do with anyone takin on the Hulk, it would have made more sence to put him in Iron Man since Steve Rogers n Tony Stark are such good friends... well up until the Civil War lol
Man... using words like pedantic when you can't even spell sense? ****ed up.
Didn't like the guy himself I guess. Came off as hokey.
yeah nice come back...
this movie was TOP, only thing i didnt like is liv tyler... what the deuce? she never spoke, she was either wisperin or shoutin lol i thought Ed Norton was a brilliant Bruce Banner
looking forward to the next one... =D
True... though I wouldn't've had a problem with a likable geek that got drawn to "the dark-side" after a horrible mutation. Wouldn't be the first time we saw that in a comic-book film and it's worked pretty well so far.
I would argue against that for the same reason. It's a cliche. Sometimes it's nice to have villains that are just dicks.
But theres nothing to say Leader goes instantly bad. From what we've seen Stern wanted to use Hulkness to cure diseases, so his inentions are mostly for the good (saving of course him not minding making an abomination). Seems his motives are "the ends justifies the means" which could offer more character insight and development.
It's fine and dandy to go down that route, but I just found his scenes annoying. Maybe a different actor could've pulled it off better, I don't know.
I like that actor but he is very ugly :(
[quote=omegga;855143]yeah nice come back...
Nice try being an asshat...
[quote=omegga;855131]dude, seriously, i made a simple point and you've blown it WAY out of proportion...
all i was saying, is that a character like Cap takes a lot of explainin to anyone who doesnt follow Marvel (ie, the majority of people who are going to see the Incredible Hulk movie) so to give him a cameo in the main feature wouldnt make sense as the majority of the audience wouldn't understand whats happenin...
that make sense...? or are you going to get even more pedantic and continue talking about him still being frozen... the films are no where near as accurate as the comics... i didnt even mention who could take on the hulk, yeah i know - i've read the avengers and the new avengers (and the ultimates) but i dont see why you brought that up because the film is based around the Abomination, and has nothin to do with anyone takin on the Hulk, it would have made more sence to put him in Iron Man since Steve Rogers n Tony Stark are such good friends... well up until the Civil War lol
And what wouldn't you understand, dumb****? Hulk was only with the Avengers for the first few issues of the original series, until he was deemed unfit to work with, by his teammates. So Cap' stepped in, Banner was relieved of duty, and the rest is history.
Yeah, extended isn't uncommon, but 70 minutes is like, Lord of the Rings length.
[COLOR="Silver"]i was a bit confused by something. i know that they kind of "toned down" what the hulk is capable of after Ang Lee's version, but when he was fightin the Abomination, he had huge cuts all up his arm n shoulders, but i thought he was meant to heal rapidly, so did they just tone this ability down as well? anyone else notice this?[/COLOR]
Wanted to make him look cool.
[quote=omegga;855406]Ok you know what? **** off!! You
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/Universal/Disc_Announcements/Incredible_Hulk_Blu-ray_Planned_with_70_Minutes_of_Cut_Footage/1819
Another, more reliable source, about the 70+ minutes of cut footage rumor.
I'll be horribly surprised if it ends up being true.
You think the director is exaggerating or just lying?
I don't know, just sounds like a lot
This is true, but it's not completely unheard of or anything. I could see 70+ minutes as an exaggeration, but from what I've read about Norton's original script, it had a lot more about the origin, character development and much more of Banners travels and his apparent suicide wish
Anoyone else think Hulk looked more like Eric Bana than Norton? I can't see any Ed in greeny's design.
[quote=Bebop;855158]I would argue against that for the same reason. It's a cliche. Sometimes it's nice to have villains that are just dicks.
But theres nothing to say Leader goes instantly bad. From what we've seen Stern wanted to use Hulkness to cure diseases, so his inentions are mostly for the good (saving of course him not minding making an abomination). Seems his motives are "the ends justifies the means" which could offer more character insight and development.
I seem to remember Sterns being a bumbling, quivering wuss when Blonsky had him at gunpoint. It may have only appeared that he wanted to go along with creating the Abomination. It almost seemed comical as an attempt to disuade the treatment-
seriously, asking a Super Soldier to sign a release form?
[quote=Bebop;856189]Anoyone else think Hulk looked more like Eric Bana than Norton? I can't see any Ed in greeny's design.
Just looked like the pre-modern age Hulk to me..
[quote]Dale Keown's comic book artwork of the Hulk was an inspiration for his design.
[quote]Samuel Sterns, played by Tim Blake Nelson, was introduced to set him up as a villain in a future film, where he would become the Leader. Nelson is signed on to reprise the role. Ty Burrell wants to portray the superpowered Doc Samson faithfully to the comics. Norton said, "The whole thing was to envision it in multiple parts. We left a lot out on purpose. [The Incredible Hulk] is definitely intended as chapter one." Leterrier made the film's final shot of Banner ambiguous; if there is a sequel, it would mean Banner finally masters control over his anger; if there is not a sequel, the shot indicates instead that in the scheduled 2011 feature The Avengers, he becomes a menace. Leterrier and Roth are contracted to return, but Norton is not.
they introduced Nick fury in a cameo
Yeah, no kidding, thanks.
I am probably one of the few people who did not enjoy this movie while it was an alright movie I want to know why they messed with the origin story and why does the hulk have to resort to litterally shanking the abomination when time and time a gain in the comics he's kicked the crap outa him
It didn't really change the origin story, they just combined a couple, namely the television show and the Ultimate storyline. As for the Abomination thing, well, it's a movie. Do you really want it to be like World War Hulk where he's infinitely powerful and can destroy nearly everything with barely any effort? Wouldn't make such a great film if he stomped Abomination in a few seconds would it?
Was there somethihng after the credits?
No, only the Marvel Studios logo..
they didn't have to mess with Ironman's origin story except updating to make it more modern and I wanted to see the hulk abomination fight done but differently the only thing I liked about the fight is when hulk uses his sonic clap to put out the fire and make abomination miss by smashing the ground. I was expecting more or a fight like the old hulk show's 90's cartoon not live action or like the Ultimates movies. I'm also confused about the continuity because Ironman seemed to be in the 616 universe but then they throw in Ultimate Hulk and Ultimate Nick fury
Again, they didn't really **** with the story, they just combined a couple, pretty much like every other superhero movie. As for different characters from different universes, just look at it as completely separate with the movies being its own universe in itself.
I was unable to enjoy this film because the trailers ([url=http://youtube.com/watch?v=FE9MRxcN0N4]1[/url] & [url=http://youtube.com/watch?v=ClEyBR_DPsg]2[/url]) told me the entire plot. They go after Bruce Banner, they create another super-being like him to try and take him out, that super-being goes out of control and the Hulk is the only thing that can stop it. I was able to see five steps ahead of any given scene. The only variable I guess was Mr. Blue, and the film did become more interesting once he entered the picture, but still, I'd been thinking the whole time I was waiting to see this movie, "there must be some twist they haven't revealed, they can't be so stupid as to show me all the events leading up to the final battle just in the trailer." OH WELL.
But the final battle was pretty sweet. I'm surprised they were able to use the phrase "HULK SMASH" without making it sound retarded.
Well alright I'll accept that
[quote=Vampiro V. Empire;856606]Some dude gets turned into a freak, some dude gets mad at said dude and wants to be a freak, dude turns into a freak, both dudes battle it out with the good dude beating the bad dude.
Did someone say "Bad Dude"?
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v504/Lobo_Rules/baddude0.png[/IMG]
no
I have to say I love how they did the end of the movie though(trying to get back to the topic)
Silly boy, Vampy and I weren't derailing-
just one liners and a minor break in subject.
But yeah, the ending was nicely sequenced and put together. I like that Bruce was focusing himself into controlling the Hulk; unleashing/repressing.
Spoilers: [spoiler]And Tony Stark coming into the bar to talk over the Avenger Initiative with Gen. "Thunderbolt" Ross. Possibly leading us to believe the sequel to go one of two ways. Either A) Banner joins the Avengers, or B) Banner becomes a threat towards them in the upcoming Avengers (or Iron Man) flick..[/spoiler]
I'm just gonna go ahead and say you read the wiki page on the film for that spoiler not saying you couldn't get it anywhere else but thats pretty much what it says
Yeah, I read it-
then I just put it into lighter terms..
Wai-
But, that was two/three days ago..
whats with the trailing sentences
I had second thoughts, and a memory fart.
ah makes sense
or he becomes a threat , then joins ;)
[quote=Linko_16;856562][COLOR=indigo]I was unable to enjoy this film because the trailers ([URL="http://youtube.com/watch?v=FE9MRxcN0N4"]1[/URL] & [URL="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ClEyBR_DPsg"]2[/URL]) told me the entire plot. They go after Bruce Banner, they create another super-being like him to try and take him out, that super-being goes out of control and the Hulk is the only thing that can stop it. I was able to see five steps ahead of any given scene. The only variable I guess was Mr. Blue, and the film did become more interesting once he entered the picture, but still, I'd been thinking the whole time I was waiting to see this movie, "there must be some twist they haven't revealed, they can't be so stupid as to show me all the events leading up to the final battle just in the trailer." OH WELL.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=indigo]But the final battle was pretty sweet. I'm surprised they were able to use the phrase "HULK SMASH" without making it sound retarded.[/COLOR]
The trailers left out the super soldier process administered to Blonsky, you just get the idea that Gen. Ross creates the Abomination to battle the Hulk. See, they actually kept one minorly integral plot device under wraps. Not that it was anything incredible, but could you've guessed that Blonsky was given the serum in an effort to battle Hulk just from the trailers?
[quote=oswaldothelegend;857023]or he becomes a threat , then joins ;)
The way it went about in the comics is almost similar to that statement, just a bit backwards. And stupid. Hopefully Hulk has to battle Thor first, before actually joining. It'd be kind of weird though, having the first Avenger roster include both Hulk AND Cap', what about Henry Pym the Ant-Man/Giant Man?
It depends on if Hulk can control himself or not. If Banner has the ability to at least administer some control over himself and his Hulk persona it would make sense for him to join first.
And that appears to be the direction they're taking, as evident with the last bit of the film.
According to a quick look at wiki:
[Quote]Leterrier made the film's final shot of Banner ambiguous; if there is a sequel, it would mean Banner finally masters control over his anger; if there is not a sequel, the shot indicates instead that in the scheduled 2011 feature The Avengers, he becomes a menace
Very interesting, so he could potentially be a timed villian when Avengers role around
Or both.
So far, the entire Marvel2film reboot seems to be taking swings at the Ultimates' universe. Not your traditional everyday Marvel monthly..
(Exhibit A.)
[IMG]http://www.worstpreviews.com/images/headlines/headline7772.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://content9.flixster.com/photo/11/08/52/11085203_ori.jpg[/IMG]
[quote]Actor Samuel L. Jackson gave his consent for Marvel Comics to use his likeness in their redesign of the Fury character for The Ultimates, and first appeared with this revised look in Ultimates #1, as drawn by John Cassaday. This is not a unique practice for writer Mark Millar, who similarly had artist J.G. Jones use the explicit likenesses of Eminem, Halle Berry and Tommy Lee Jones for the major characters in the miniseries Wanted (although, in this case, apparently without their consent). The similarity is even noted within the comic itself, in a scene in which the Ultimates discuss who they think should play each of them in a hypothetical movie about the team. Fury's answer for himself is "Mr. Samuel L. Jackson, of course." Such is the popularity of the Jackson-inspired version of the character that Jackson was contracted to portray Fury in Iron Man despite the film being an adaptation of the mainstream Marvel Universe version of the character, rather than choose a caucasian actor to play the matching classic version of Fury. This was, however, probably in no small part due to Jackson's own cult following and the fact that (a version of) the character had now been well-established as having a popular real actor's likeness, making it a logical choice.
Other wiki: In the Ultimate Marvel Universe, General Nick Fury is African-American, with his look and personality tailored after actor Samuel L. Jackson. This was done with the actor's explicit permission. Jackson also played Nick Fury in the 2008 film Iron Man, appearing in a post-credits scene.
-and I like it.
edit: I just couldn't endure [URL="http://www.qwipster.net/nickfury.jpg"]this[/URL], again..
Ant man is getting his own movie
We know, thanks.
Durden asked dill hole.
[quote=Zaith;857467]Durden asked dill hole.
Yo'..yo'.. watch how you talk to my wife.
I said dill hole I've seen much worse things on this thread
"Dill hole" is only offensive because it makes whoever says it sound like a complete moron from the early to mid-nineties.
Dill hole has eventually graduated to D*ckhole, since the nineties.
I'm just assuming that Zaith still watches Beavis and Butt-head.
That would be a negative on the Beavis and Butt-head never really liked it thought it was dumb. I never really got into most cartoons I watched live actions shows, except for a things like the simpsons. and I use dill hole because I figure its less offensive and i don't see the point of writing something if its just going to come out as astrics anyway
**** you
thanks for the maturity
I'm kidding. Lighten up.
HULK SMASH RAWR.
Over 9000.
well its sorta hard to tell how someones conveying a message through text especially when you don't actually know the person.
Just don't take anything that's said here seriously. Chances are the person doesn't mean it, and if they do it'll be really obvious.
what more obvious then **** you.
Nah, not in that way.
Just ignore Vamp. It's always hard to tell when he's delibertly being a dumb annoying **** or if he's accidently being a dumb annoying ****.
someone sounds butthurt
I'm just trying to save Zaith alot of effort and time for the future.
Fatty.
[quote=Zaith;857821]That would be a negative on the Beavis and Butt-head never really liked it thought it was dumb. I never really got into most cartoons I watched live actions shows, except for a things like the simpsons. and I use dill hole because I figure its less offensive and i don't see the point of writing something if its just going to come out as astrics anyway
I understand, I still watch the Power Rangers, too.
[quote=Zaith;857836]well its sorta hard to tell how someones conveying a message through text especially when you don't actually know the person.
Neither Vamp, nore I are to be taken serious. We like to **** with you. We like to **** with ALL new members. Hazing CAN be fun!
Penis..
[quote=Vampiro V. Empire;857894]someone sounds butthurt
wikka wikka uh-slim Anus..
[quote=Bebop;857909]I'm just trying to save Zaith alot of effort and time for the future.
Fatty.
You big dumb stupid head..
not even a new kid thing, buddy.
Yeah, we're ****ing with Bebop. And he's an older member than us..
Some prospects thrown towards the role of [URL="http://www.film.com/movies/story/casting-captain-america-avengers-movie/11597472/20829622"]Cap[/URL]'..
All of them suck save for Damon whom I approve of.
[URL="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0568180/"]Neal McDonough[/URL], who wasn't named, could probably handle the role with a good sense of accuracy and respect.
Oh man, I HATE that guy.
And Cap' isn't "hate-worthy"?
Wai-
Daniel Craig has been argued for a choice, I read elsewhere.. no?
Daniel Craig would make a kick *** cap
@Durden: Thats an awesome pick
I think computer animation of his dull green skin powerface look needs hydration - a shiny, sweaty suntan oil look to get my attention. It will take patience to see many destructive scenes from this weaponless schitzophysical (body-transforming) super-leviathan.
[quote=Zaith;859351]Daniel Craig would make a kick *** cap
@Durden: Thats an awesome pick
Yeah-
considering I'm not really all that fond of Mr. Craig, or most of his films.. other than L4YER CAK3 (which I "soiled" my pants over).
He could handle the mantle of Captain America..
The world needs no British Captain America, now a British Captain Britain...
And an Ausie Solid Snake makes more sense?
Well Metal gear has never been realistic and where did you get the cap/deadpool pick
[quote=Zaith;859492]Well Metal gear has never been realistic and where did you get the cap/deadpool pick
It's from the cover of "Cable & Deadpool [URL="http://pnmedia.gamespy.com/planetxmen.gamespy.com/images/solicits/200709/cabledeadpool-45.jpg"]#45[/URL]", I do believe..
it is sexy, isn't it..no?
Realistic? Why throw that word in thar? Seriously? Metal Gear is very plausible, considering how corrupt the US Government is, when considering what actions they would mind taking during an arms race?
Remember [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative"]Star Wars[/URL]-
and it's sister offensive initiative; [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction"]MAD[/URL].
I like that Daniel Craig Cap idea actually
certain things are fine but, Liquid arm taking Revolver over, giant robots, and Vamp are all a bit unrealistic don'tcha think
[quote=Zaith;859752]certain things are fine but, Liquid arm taking Revolver over, giant robots, and Vamp are all a bit unrealistic don'tcha think
No, not entirely.. Vampirism or the practice is atleast real. So are the nano-machines that hold Vamp together.
And, if Phantom limb works one way.. it's possible to have a doner affect with limbs that are NOT your own.
Dick Clark is a giant robot..
Touche
If it can happen in a film or book, Zaith. Then chances are; the US military is already underway in a developmental program to create whatever it is to be ultimately ahead in win.
The Yautja's cloaking device (idea) was created well over 20 years ago for film. The US is still marketing certain equipment to this day (only it's nothing really technologically amazing. Just a smattering of micro-fibers, patterns in material, and spider web-laden suits) under the hopes of a similar method for one little aspect.. that you can hide in plain sight.
True we also have those doors that open on there own like in Star Trek
Motion doors have been around since the late 80's.. I know, because I'm older than dirt, and I remember when K-Mart first attacked my city with it's Big Red Scare of departmentness..
It was a joke. I know its been around for along time.
Ooo, thanks for the tip.