... Is being developed by Treyarch and is going back to World War II. ***. ****ing. ****it.
http://www.treyarch.com/jobs.html
Scroll down to the level editor position - they're looking for someone to make WWII maps for Call of Duty.
why? its like shooting themselfs in the foot. i personally hated the first three cod games (three was ok at best) but i loved cod 4
How the hell do they expect this to work? Like, are they absolutely oblivious?
Treyarch doesn't even make that good of games.
I guess the upside is no one gives a **** about WWII games anymore, so no one will have to suffer through it. And they aren't tainting the awesomeness of modern warfare
Couldn't they at least have made it about Vietnam or some other ****ty 20th century war? Regardless, this'll be embarrassing.
[quote=The X;791607]Couldn't they at least have made it about Vietnam or some other ****ty 20th century war? Regardless, this'll be embarrassing.
WW2 is a perfect setting for a game though, lots of content and it displayed thousands of heroes, after WW2 million man armies were replaced by high tech weaponry. WW2 was the defining time for a few countries and it brought people together. What has any other war done??
They could have switched it up though with an alternate reality of WW2, sort of like Resistance without the futuristic weapons.
Only way COD5 will be good is if we have some kind of inaccurate WWII depiction, with Nazis riding T-Rexes and Daft Punk traveling back in time to aid the French rebellion. Otherwise, I'd rather eat buffalo ****.
They should remake the Pearl Harbor invasion from dual perspectives, the whole thing, though! From Japanese occupation of a Alaskan Island (whatever they're called, jeez) to the attack, and then getting tea-bagged with two atomics.
Same for the US, living both perspectives, and all. That would be not-suicide, I think.
Hey, everyone loves the modern theme. Let's go back to WWII.
Where's my Civil War game?
yeah, I'm pretty sure that's the internet, buddy. Not wwii
**** Treyarch. How can you see this Modern Warfare game be so highly liked and so popular, and then go back and make a game like CoD3 which failed. To add, how can you make a game about something there are so many games already out there for… I liked the fiction story line they made up in CoD4… why not do it again with CoD5 or like someone said make it set in another war… oh and I would lawl if they released a CoD Civil War game.
Haven't they learned their lesson? Why won't they let Infinity do their thing and maybe, like... be successful?
Here's hoping IW will start on CoD6!
CoD6 won't be the same without Price and Gaz. :(
Hopefully COD6 is set 100 years in the future, with a cybernetically enhanced great-great grandson of Price.
It's probably be around the same time-frame. Something more akin to GRAW perhaps? So near future.
This is funny. We are completely over looking CoD5, as we should of course.
If I have to see that damn Normandy beach again, I'm going to demand a blowjob from each and every one of Treyarch's developers.
[quote=Skitzo Control;796063]If I have to see that da[COLOR=white]m[/COLOR]n Normandy beach again, I'm going to demand a blowjob from each and every one of Treyarch's developers.
The beach only appeared in the first COD. COD2 had a cliff face near the beach.
... But I'm arguing semantics now.
You're damn right you are. Now, bag my groceries.
===
It just seems that every single WWII game has that scene from Saving Private Ryan at the very beginning. Medal of Honor did it, what, EVERY ****ING TIME? It's even in Day of Defeat!:(
The mission in the first COD where you have to survive without a gun was awesome. Treyarch will need a game full of ideas like that if they want COD5 to sell well. If you're going to make a WWII game, a least cover the Soviet Union in greater depth.
... before they decided start slaughtering innocents, obviously.
i think they should set it in the future. it worked for Ghost Recon and battle field so it should work fine with call of duty. also they should release a public beta again cuz that really started the fire that is cod 4
i'm kinda glad they are going back to WWII, Treyarch probably wouldn't be able to pull off modern warfare anyway. I hope treyarch gets their act together, they TOTALLY screwed the ps3 version of COD3. I still find COD3 fun though :-\ just would have preferred to have mics online, maybe have some sort of ranking system, maybe some split screen, and maybe killcam too! That would be good! If Treyarch has all that in COD5 for the ps3, i'll be one happy camper.
It's been done, by the History Channel. Decent game actually.
Hahaha, no it isn't.
yea that game sucked hard, the one shot then reload for 5 min really ****ed me off
Except you reloaded pretty quickly. Quickly enough for it to look retarded.
It did give me about 700 points with little time spent though. I remember laughing a few times, too. "Don't forget me arrrrgggg"
Idk, I liked it. It was like a really crappy Call of Duty, but still fun.
Wow, I honestly think the dumbest move possible has just been made. Lets take a game where after 4 tries people are talking big things about. Yeh, 1,2 and 3 were good games and had a large fan base but c'mon 4 is actually comparable to Halo in a lot of people's eyes... I know people at my work that got a 360 just for COD 4 online. Whatever, no matter what time period it's in, it will sell, they will make a profit but I think they should stick on the road they are on.