[CENTER]This is so well put together, this is no "conspiracy theory" anymore.
[youtube=vuBo4E77ZXo]vuBo4E77ZXo[/youtube]
[/CENTER]
So I have to believe what I see on YouTube?
It's an actual movie, which won various awards.
Oh lol. Didn't even hear about it.
I've seen it. The actually video is, like, an hour and a half long or so. I forget the name, but there's a site where you can go and see the whole thing. The first section makes the case that religion is false and is used to herd the public, then the next two focus on stuff like this.
It's called Zeitgeist and you can view it at [URL="http://vgchat.com/www.zeitgeistmovie.com"]www.zeitgeistmovie.com[/URL]
Somebody told me I should watch it, but based on that description of the first part, I think I might just pass.
I want to see a conspiracy video that has sources. Just once.
I was a strong believer of Jesus. I still believe in g0d and that we all have the potential to be a true saviour. I thought the first part was looney until they displayed facts.
[quote=MottaTheHutt;781132][COLOR=black]I want to see a conspiracy video that has sources. Just once.[/COLOR]
They do, it shows congressmen speaking about the subjects which they show. This one man was friends with Rockerfeller until Rockerfeller explained what the US are going to do to the Middle East and thats raeping them of the oil. It explains they don't care how many bystanders they kill, "only care about you and your family".
I generally hear conspiracy videos such as this referred to as bogus by people I'm inclined to trust (one of my college professors mentioned it, and even South Park had that one episode that poked fun at people who believed 9/11 was an inside job), but I've never heard some of this stuff refuted. In particularly, videos that have shown the attack on the Pentagon on 9/11 have some really fishy stuff... apparently, random junk was recovered from the site of the crash that doesn't belong in an airplane, and the bulk of the airplane is completely missing, allegedly "vaporized" by the heat. According to these videos, the path of the airplane should've done a lot more damage, and what the wreckage actually looks like makes it seem as though it was done by a missile. The icing on the cake is that a security camera in a nearby building got this all on tape, but the government confiscated that and, according to the videos, forced the employees who saw it to keep their mouths shut. They later released a few fuzzy frames from this video depicting an explosion, but kept what was apparently a perfectly good video for themselves.
I'm not inclined to believe that the government would be doing all that these conspiracy videos say it is, but that definitely presents a ****ed good case that I've never heard debunked.
Lol @ facts
****, I'm going to have to watch this just to laugh at it, aren't I.
I've done quite a bit of research on RFID technologies, and while I'd say they're not a good thing in general for anyone who has even a mild interest in privacy/anonymity, the stuff in the film is over the top.
As it stands, it wouldn't be practical to control people with the chips by just "turning them off". RFID chips only have an effective range of a few feet - it's not like they can turn them off from satellites or anything, as I believe was suggested. And the way in which they'd be watching you would be from node to node; again, not via satellite. If you went into a store, which would be wired with nodes, they'd know that chip #1234567890000000 regestered to Jane Doe appeared in the Starbucks Coffee at 7901 Central Boulevard NE at 10:31 am. They wouldn't necessarily know what went on in between. However, it should be said, I suppose, that node-to-node tracking is entirely possible with the technology availible today. I hate to add fuel to the fire, but it is true.
Really, if you're worried about anything in the short-term with RFID chips, you might as well have your panic attack over the RFID-enabled credit-cards. It's alarmingly easy to steal information off them, which is what I'd be concerned about, were I, in fact, concerned at all.
All of that being said, I think I should make it clear that I think this video reeks of insanity. The only part I think has any merit is a portion of what is said concerning RFID chips and how they could potentially be used. It technologically is possible to do some of what was described.
oh **** look at my post I made it at 2:22pm mountain time IF YOU MULTIPLY THAT BY 3 you get 666 which is the MARK OF THE BEAST COINCIDENCE? I'M THINKING CONSPIRACY!
I hope the NSA abducts you all.
Sam Fisher is on his way as we speak.
It's easy to convince people of any conspiracy by using scientific data. Theories that, unless you're an expert, a common person has no way of disputing. I wish more people would do more research that wasn't influenced by the conspiracy theorists before making up their mind about this type of stuff. I personally don't believe 9/11 was a controled explosion, and I also don't think we're on the verg of becoming some novel like 1984.
There's plenty of evidence to dispute that 9/11 was an inside job.
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
Check the links at the bottom too. ***, this is like the third time I've posted this link in one of Rddflag's threads.
Yeah, the links he gives at the bottom are much more helpful than his information. Tho he does bring up a good point in saying that if the government had no moral objection to killing thousands of innocent people, then they'd certainly kill the creators of loose change.
I'm nost saying that the government is pure. I'm simply saying the idea of 911 being a hoax is extremely far-fetched.
lol like Bush could pull of a 911 hoax.
The government can hardly make money and we expect them to be able to pull off a secret plot? Lol rite
[quote=xuclo;782031]The government can hardly make money and we expect them to be able to pull off a secret plot? Lol rite
They don't need to make money, I believe they loan it from the federal reserve.
...The government doesn't need to earn money? What kind of cretin are you?
[quote=WillisGreeny;782193]That stuff is so heavilly tracked that any banker reading your statments would laugh their asses off. If the government wanted to use money for expenses that weren't popular they would simply add it to the budget and say it was for something else. The Federal reserve doesn't work like your local bank.
Yes it does, they control the money supply. Read up on it.
Here I did it for you: 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the nation acting as fiscal agents for the U.S. Treasury, each with its own nine-member board of directors; (4) numerous private U.S. member banks, which subscribe to required amounts of non-transferable [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock"]stock[/URL] in their regional Federal Reserve Banks; and (5) various advisory councils.
And where's the part where politicians go in and use it as a piggy bank for their evil organizations? Spare me the lesson, I know how the Federal Bank works and you were agruing that politicians took money out and spent it, not that the banks regulate currency. Unlike the local bank, The federal bank doesn't work with individual loans. From my understanding, the bank controls the flow of how much currency is available, indirectly controling interest rates so that inflation and all the other bad things that can happen with unmanaged money doesn't occure. It manages what state currency is in, NOT who it goes to. Do MORE research.
No, the President and Advisors take out loans, owe it back, thats why the Loonie is worth more.
I admit, I obviously can't explain it without help. [youtube=U_vLTSWpQcY]U_vLTSWpQcY[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_vLTSWpQcY
[URL="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=money+supply+printing+fiat&btnG=Google+Search"]You can't explain it, but others can, read about money supply and fiat[/URL].
Next study this, the "Gold Reserve and the US Dollar" or the "Gold Standard".
Next study, suicide, 4 timeskipz bai
That doesn't sound right at all.
What a one-sided, alarmist, peice of **** video. National Government 101: Congress controls the tax payer's money. At any point, Congress can withdrawl and reform all currency operations that are happening at the Fed bank at any time. The Fed's don't have an army, and the constitution gives congress the ability to recognize what America's currency is. If Congress decided "**** the current Fed bank, it's not working well" they could.
But your statment about the president borrowing money from the federal reserve is completely false, it has to be approved by congress like everything else, emphasis being that the GOVERNMENT is borrowing, not the president.
Yep, Romania changed their whole money system in 2004. I think they want to do it again in 2014 :( **** THE EURO. NEW LEI FOREVER.
See how smart you guys are, and if you can figure it all out, read this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_currency
Let me know when you get a masters degree in economics when you do.
Yes, paper money is legal tender unless noted otherwise. It used to be you could get gold for your money but now it's just "legal tender". The federal reserve can bring even Donald Trump to his knees.
I saw the word "Fiat" up in wackohater's post and was hoping this thread had taken a turn in the direction of Italian automobiles.
Nope. :(:(
[URL="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Maserati+and+Ferrari&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8"]Maserati and Ferrari[/URL] are what you should be into little girl.
[URL="http://www.maserati.com/jsp/introSottosezione.jsp?menuKey=m91&category=%2Fmaserati%2Fcars%2Fmcc&BV_SessionID=@@@@0307710697.1195621607@@@@&BV_EngineID=cccdaddmiigfhehcefeceegdgimdfmk.0"]Get one of these when you marry a brain surgeon[/URL].
Or [URL="http://www.boch.com/bochhtml/bochferrari/pages/Default.aspx"]one of these when you become the next Shakira.[/URL]