Why I like PSP better then DS

1. Has conventionl gameplay.
2. Better graphics
3. Grand Theft Auto and SOCOM
4. No Stylus to lose
5. More fun games (well more games that appel to me)

I disagree.
I believe that DS has more games that are fun.

Not to offend anyone that likes them, think most DS games are lame. Not enough violence.

Yeah right pokemon is like cock fighting.

[QUOTE=Vampiro]And that's where it all goes to ****.[/QUOTE


Violence is what (in my openion) makes games fun.

It's not the violence itself that's fun, but how you create it, what you create it with, where you create it, or even whom you create it with.

[quote=Larry The Great]1. Has conventionl gameplay.
*Conventional. Oh, and the DS's gameplay is as conventional as that of the PSP - Point moot. It's more likely you're referring to the control scheme, in which case I dare you to say that the PSP's button layout is more flexible and easy to use than the DS's buttons + touchscreen. Plus, this is something which differs ENTIRELY between titles.

[quote]2. Better graphics
Very, very marginally, and again, it depends on what you're playing.

[quote]3. Grand Theft Auto and SOCOM
Mmm, yes, because they're both INCREDIBLY FUN after you rack up 60+ hours of play on each. Bland and repetitive once you've finished the single-player campaigns, and Socom's online mode is ****.

[quote]4. No Stylus to lose
DS came packaged with two styli, DS Lite came packaged with two styli, replacements are £1.99 a pack, both handhelds have a stylus storage slot. Sorry, but you have to be braindead to lose a stylus.

[quote]5. More fun games (well more games that appel to me)
*Appeal. Appeal is, indeed, subjective, but fun ISN'T. Seriously, how the hell can you enjoy the same third-person-shooter branded as ten different titles? There are a CRAZY amount of PSP games which play identically to one another - The only difference seems to be the theme in each.

[quote]Not to offend anyone that likes them, think most DS games are lame. Not enough violence.
If you need violence for something to appeal, you're not "mature" or "cool" or "sophisticated" - Quite the opposite. If you honestly can't enjoy something if it isn't a bloodbath, you're borderline retarded.

Not locking. I want to see where this hi-laaaarious debate goes.

[quote=Klarth]DS came packaged with two styli, DS Lite came packaged with two styli, replacements are

[quote=Larry The Great]1. Has conventionl gameplay.
2. Better graphics
3. Grand Theft Auto and SOCOM
4. No Stylus to lose
5. More fun games (well more games that appel to me)

*cracks knuckles*

1. Has conventionl gameplay.
The main selling point of the DS is that it's not conventional- it has a touch screen, for Pete's sake. If you want a game that has no originality in it's game design, I can name you plenty of good GBA remakes you can buy on the cheap. They specifically made a second slot for people like you.

2. Better graphics
Greater pixelation does not equal better graphics. Sure, Madden and GTA have huge detail, but I would much rather be looking at Metroid, Mario Kart or another smooth as silk Nintendo game than any PS2 clone you find on the PSP. For me, the PSP has graphics, but the DS has art.

3. Grand Theft Auto and SOCOM
Metroid, Mario Kart, Meteos, Kirby, Dragon Quest, Final Fantasy, Pokemon, Advance Wars, Resident Evil, Castlevania, Mario 64, New Super Mario Bros, Tony Hawk, etc...

4. No Stylus to lose
Yeah, because using a touch screen without a stylus is such a brilliant idea. Who in their right mind would want a DS without one?

5. More fun games (well more games that appel to me)
This is just a rewording of point number 3. If you don't give any specific, tangeble qualities, this arguement is just an opinion.

Seriously, if you wanted to diss the DS, use some real arguments, like the Friend Code system or how playing in the dark attracts bugs (I have remains of those bastards smeared on my touch screen).

**** I forgot to click "Disagree" on that douche's post, I fail again.

Anyways to me I don't care for either. Most of my friends go crazy for the PSP wile I just don't care for it. It's not worth the $200 dollars since there is yet to be a breakthrough title.

The biggest complaint I have towards the Nintendo DS is how no matter how careful I am with the stylus, I can't help but scratch the touch-screen. I think my stylus gets dirty and the particles rubs off on the screen, so I think I'd do better, much like Roy Waller, by checking the stylus often and making sure it is clean enough for touching

[+[_]::]

Does anyone else notice a huge difference between the battery life of the DS compared to the PSP? My PSP doesn't seem to last more than 4 hours. :(

My DS last longer more than my PSP.

I've played my DS so much that the battery only lasts about 3 or 4 hours now. :( Need to replace it.

Ouch, I didnt know the battery would do that :o

My DSL's battery lasts a good 14 hours of continuous play. My PSP lasts five hours if I clock the processor down to 133 minimum, turn the backlight way down and turn the sound off.

What's more is that the developers originally wanted to develop it for DS. :/

:o, what happened! Tell more!

I would like to clear something up. When I posted"violence is waht makes games fun" I was somewhat tired. What I ment to say is violence tends to make games better in my openion. I just like action oriented games better. Nothing wrong what that right?

Shut the **** up and die.

You wonder how many times hes headbutted the keyboard to come up with this crap. :cookie:

you people seriously don't get what he's trying to say, he doesn't like the point that half the games on DS are all narrow minded inovations using the touchscreen with anime styled graphics, he prefers full 3D graphics where the game has a large amount of detail and interation... and lots of guns... so DS really isn't for him, apart from metroid and resi, nothing it has to offer suits him...

At least thats what i guess he means...

You are a ****ing moron.

Narrow minded idiot :3

Also PSP has FAR more anime faggotry than DS. Defunct logic durrr

Enjoy your ports.

I think Larry makes several good points.

Saying "lololol violence is 4 adultz so vilent gamez r teh good" is not a good point.

Spoilers: same person.

If you can't figure out how to do "non traditional gameplay", and how not to lose the stylus, then you're too ****ed stupid to deserve the privilege of enjoying any videogames, let alone violent ones.

PSP breaks too easily, scratches too easily, DS is teh toughness

But when it's a scratch on the outside of the DS's clamshell shape, original or Lite, it doesn't matter so much.

When the PSP's huge screen with its over-the-top quality takes damage (or has a dead pixel), you notice... a lot.

What in bloody hell is the point of the flameing? I just like mor action baised games, is that a bloody crime?

No, you think violence makes a better game. Us being elitists thusly feel the need to flame.

psp is much better because of the multiple functionality such as wifi and reading produo sticks and the wider range of games that dont blow ***. the only good games ive seen or played for ds are mario and final fantasy 3

the psp is so much better because of the functions such as wifi and reading produo sticks plus the psp has a much better selection of games that dont blow ***. the only good games ive seen or played for ds are mario and final fantasy 3

Nothing wrong with him liking more action based games. I myself like jrpg, somthing the n64 and gc lacked. I just realized this is psp board wow alot of ****ing trolls.

Yeah, he's right, Dexter. GC definitely lacked any good RPGs. It had a few really good ones, but a few really doesn't cut it.

So he thinks violence makes a game more fun/action games are more fun. Big deal. IT'S CALLED AN OPINION.

The thing is it's a stupid opinion.

That's a stupid viewpoint. [color=dimgray]LOL C WUT I DID THUR!?[/COLOR]

Ok. Say he plays Timesplitters 2. If there was blood when you shot people, he thinks it would be more fun, yet it doesn't change anything, except for making red marks.

Wooooo!

Yeah, the Internet is a wondrous place. Filled with flamers who can't except the fact that people will *gasp* think differently than them!

Hey, I'm down with violence. Violence and gore is cool (What's up, Gears?), but I'll call you an idiot if you honestly believe it can make a mediocre game suddenly cool, or the lack of violence make a great game suddenly mediocre.

Opinion is awesome until some idiot starts spouting them. THAT'S WHY THE INTERNET IS AWESOME. I CAN SAY THINGS AND FEEL ALL BADASS WITHOUT THE FEAR OF GETTING MY FACE BEAT IN. LOL

I agree with that last part, I'm scrawny as hell.

Doesn't mean I have to be an ******* about everything.

I can't tell if you're kidding or being sincere.

EDIT: Suzu Fujibayashi'd

Not exactly. The second time around he said he prefered more actiony games.

[quote]I would like to clear something up. When I posted"violence is waht makes games fun" I was somewhat tired. What I ment to say is violence tends to make games better in my openion. I just like action oriented games better. Nothing wrong what that right?

WAY TO ONLY USE PART OF THE SENTENCE.

The rest of the post has no bearing when one sentence says "violence makes games better." durr durr durr.

We he says that violence "tends to make" games fun, that's retarded. But when he includes, "I like action oriented games more" it makes sense. Because action oriented games have, you guessed it! Violence!

Why does he think violence makes games better? Because he likes action games.

lol see wut i did thur

... No. Because he still thinks violence makes games better. The original point was that the DS lacked good games because it didn't have enough violence, even though there's quite a bit of action games on the system. It doesn't matter whether he likes action games more, because, well, who doesn't (as most games are action games)? It's the fact he believes violence is what makes a game good. That alone is reason enough for me to think he's an idiot. Why in the hell you're trying to defend him is beyond me.

mind naming afew action games for the ds?

http://www.gamefaqs.com/portable/ds/list_action.html

[quote]Why in the hell you're trying to defend him is beyond me.

Because I don't like it when people argue so strongly against an opinion. You're not gonna change his mind.

Uh, you're a moron. I'm not arguing against him or trying to change his mind. I'm calling him an idiot for his opinion. Nothing more.

hmm bubble bobble an action game? A great game but i think he looking for more of dmc type of action game. I'm just defending his right to his opinion , against people who really even shouldn't be on this psp board.

He's entitled to his opinion, just as I'm entitled to mine :cookie:

qft

BECAUSE WE AREN'T PRAISING IT, MAN!

lol

No but really, I demand answers to this question.

IT PRINTS MONEY LOL

Violence is not the ONLY thing that makes games fun, I just like games with more action better. Is that a crime?

The guy who started the thread.

[quote]Violence is not the ONLY thing that makes games fun, I just like games with more action better. Is that a crime?

No.

Okay. I'm voting for an 'end thread.'

Nope. This ****'s never going to end.

Dang. If that's the case I'll just have to keep it alive, then.

So, how's life?

btw FFIII > psp games

PSP just has more games that I enjoy playing.

lol no it doesn't

Serial killer from the moon.

Castlevania.

Metroid etc

The only game PSP has going for it is MGS:PO. Which is awesome. But that's it.

Killzone Liberation Front, Lumines.

Nah, Killzone sucks and Lumines is on other **** now.

I thought Killzone was fun... :\

I didn't really enjoy it. It's solid, but not my cup of tea. Like I said, the only killer app I've noticed on the PSP is MGSPO. The rest are average or awful.

Yeah, the DS definately has a better game selection, IMO.

Though it's not really fair to say, considering the PSP really doesn't have that many games in total. You're bound to get more top titles in a large selection. What's up, PS2?

My PSP is already Broken the top black plastic part is completely broken off and my screen is cracked all to hell ig ot pocket lint and alot of other **** in there so I just use it for music now. Id say the DS is better because 1. it doesnt break as easily and 2. its got zelda, mario, metroid, etc...

When is the Zelda for DS coming out, again?

Zelda no Densetsu: Phantom Hourglass Nintendo TBA 2006 JP
The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass Nintendo TBA EU
The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass Nintendo Q1 2007 US

Arcadios mind filling me in what you disagree with? judging by the way you disagreed with rebelgamer you denying the man of his right?

Awesome.

Suprised much?

Nope. Wouldn't be Zelda otherwise.

Sometime in March, I'm guessing.

Just in time for my 14 hour bus ride to Boston. =\

He has the right to have the opinion that violence makes games fun. However that doesnt mean his opinion is equal to everyone elses.

Yeah, we're way past that.

Is everyone on this board a Nintendo fanboy? All most all of you talk like it.

Nope. We just don't like idiots.

I like how apparently, people who are not "zomg blood gunz" are Nintendo Fanboys. What stupid logic.

Actually, if you actually read the thread, he said:

"Not enough violence for the DS"
"Sorry, I was tired, what I meant was that there was not enough violence for the DS because violence is what makes games fun."

That's where it shows that he doesn't know what "action" games are. Go on any game site and go on the Action section. Not all violence, so he doesn't like action games. He's just trying to make himself appear less silly.

Nothing better to do.

It's funny. He claims he's "great" even though he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.

I would pay, like, $100 for that PSP Metal Gear Solid game if it was ported to the DS. Us violence starved Nintendo DS fans can only dream... :(

But as it's not released for the DS, you can't say that.....

No, I've played and beaten MGS:PO... I can safely say it would be terrible on the DS as a port.

Based on what

Play the game. Figure it out for yourself. Because I can say "based on everything" and end up being right. It wouldn't work in so many **** ways it's not even funny.

You know shade does have things better to do because he couldve come up with a lot better than that.

prolly

No, because you said "You think you are Kirby" regardless of me saying or doing anything Kirby-like. But he claims he is great. And I said "You think you are great."

Vamp was right, this really will never end.

Shut the **** up, *** ****it.

This message will be repeated until its demand is met.