http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006210370,00.html
A write-up in the Sun already. I love how Zelda's graphics are 'jaw-droppingly beautiful'. And they're on par with the GameCube.
Actually, come to that - has the Wii version got a graphic upgrade? I don't remember seeing anything that said they were that different...
It looked like it was running at a higher framerate, at the very least.
MP3?
Looked quite awesome.
And RedSteel didn't look all that bad, either.
[quote=Prince Shondronai]It looked like it was running at a higher framerate, at the very least.
Don't know how the hell you'd notice that, Zelda always ran at 60FPS anyway.
Wii is 2-3 times more powerful than Gamecube from what I read. Basically all that is upgraded to next gen status is the controls/player input device. They believe this gimmick is enough to sell units, and they are probably right. You know they can count on the "graphics dont mean anything" crowd to back them up 100%.
Graphics don't mean everything.
Nope, and Wii srsly have enough grapical power.
IMHO.
I think having a remote for a controller is kind of dumb. But the counsole itself looks pretty cool. I think it's funny how sony is copying the motion-sensing. I can't wait to tell my friend Mark that. He won't believe it.
I would say that Zelda looked really cool....can't say the same about Red Steel, that was a little dissappointing.
I thought that Red Steel looks amazing. Seriously, it's not THAT far behind the 360.
UuUuUuUuUuUu fIsHiNg FoR zElDa!!! that's gunna be fun.
[quote]Wii is unlikely to beat the big two in the UK sales stakes but if it's priced cheap enough, will surely become the second console in every home.
:( I've always been annoyed at people who identify Nintendo as a "discount console maker".
They updated the Wii version's graphics, but it's probably hard to tell watching a video of it.