http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060310/film_nm/bond_dc_1
...It's still Bond, right...?
:/
He's hot.
But that's not the point! Where's all the nifty gadgets? :(
It could work, I think.
I was just looking forward to John Cleese. Now I don't even know if I still want to see it. :(
Lame. If I wanted to see a hardass in a jungle battling some non-white dude with boring guns then I'd watch those hundreds of other movies like that. James Bond is basically about some cool English guy with an awesome car, neat gadgets and beautiful women. That's kinda what set it apart from all of those other ****ty action movies...
It is from the director of Goldeneye, though, which happens to be my favorite 007 film. However, that is largely due to the Nintendo 64 game. Zorro was lame.
The reason these are not in this film is because it supposed to be Bond's first mission as a sapy after leaving the SAS (or something). So basically he's a rookie spy. I would imagine only the top dwag spies like older Bond, talk to Q directly or get harder, more dangerous missions where more gadetry is needed.
I stopped watching James Bond when Sean Connery stopped play the role.
Then you're missing out on some of the best Bond moments.
I agree. I don't see what's so good about Sean. Perice was the best I'd say.
I don't know, it could be an improvement, in my eyes. I was really dissapointed, and could even say I hated the last two. Die Another Day was tasteless, dragged on fake action, and so was World Was Not Enough. Just, uh, not as much. I loved Goldeneye to death, and I hope this one might have the same sort of feeling that some other Bond movies have had, rather then the mondo-technology special effects of say, Die Another Day.
Although I loved Pierce, it'll be interesting to see how this one acts.