Linkin Park appreciation thread

c'mon guyz, lets salut teh reel gods of met4l!

they're so impressive and original. keyboards in metal - it's insane!

They pwn Green Day.

EDIT* Everyone pwz Green Day....

Session is the best use of a turntable in any song, ever!!!!

Seriously though, it is. Klarth probably agrees with me.

i tried so [COLOR="Red"]hard[/COLOR]......




and got so [COLOR="DarkSlateGray"]far[/COLOR]





but in the [COLOR="Magenta"]end[/COLOR]...........













it [COLOR="RoyalBlue"]doesnt[/COLOR] [COLOR="SandyBrown"]even[/COLOR] [COLOR="Red"]matter[/COLOR].....


they speak to me man

don't le t them get u down, netman, cuz they haev sad songz, ya but tehy also have rel hard songs were u 4get ur troubles n just say "FUK DIS" and rok out u no

Uhg, Linkin Park has been my favorite band for awhile... But I lost respect for Mike shinoda. But I can understand, I'd be a gangsta anyday for money. Yo dis is 20% rock, Something else... Yeah.

I don't really like them very much!

As an outspoken fan of bands who combine and fuse different genres together, especially in unique and unusual ways, Linkin Park was right up my alley. Their highly innovative use of rap vocals in rock music puts them miles above any other band that is out there right now, and their virtuosic musicianship makes my head spin everytime I listen to them. But most of all, their deep, thought provoking lyrics bring tears to my eyes. LP is my all time favorite band, and nothing that anybody says will ever change that.

The technical instrumentels that Mike Shinoda puts together are always nice. Other than that, they've been going downhill since Reanimation. Hybrid Theory was great, although I overplayed it and find fault with it now, but please, Meteora was horrible. It seemed to be lacking so much that they're older stuff had. At least even out the rap, make it more technical, and less emphasis on the lyrics - I'd be willing to listen again.

This thread is the most patronizing thread ever, ever made... Ever.

I remember when Hybrid Theory first came out, I scooped it up more or less on a whim when I saw it on sale at Best Buy. I had never even heard of Linkin Park before, but when I played it, I was pleased by the sound. It seemed fun and fresh to me at the time, though it got stale after a few months. I never cared much for "Crawling," but "Papercut" is still an enjoyable song. LP's later material doesn't appeal to me at all, but honestly, I would be more content to play Hybrid Theory in my stereo than most of the "hardcore" metal members spaz over in just about every thread on this board.

-=Edit=- That last statement wasn't meant to mock anyone, either. For some reason most metal hasn't been appealing to me over the past many months, though I still am fond of DT, and a couple other recent discoveries.

The longer I've listened to music, the more I've grown to dislike choruses. I don't know why, but I prefer interesting transitions rather than this sort of repetition and predictability.

[quote=Vampiro]I don't mind repetition when it's used to give a specific feeling or emotion
angst?

I don't mind most Linkin Park songs. I doubt I'll buy a CD or anything, but they're not that bad. They're skilled musicians, and their songs are usually pretty catchy. I don't see why prettymuch everyone here has bad stuff to say about them.

Yes you do. You're just doing what you usually do by making a conscious effort to see something as beneficial when it's so obviously a negative thing in itself.

also see: chec

If a song of theirs comes on the radio, I usually dont change the station. Thats about as far as I come to appreciating them.

I'd say I'm just a shade on the negative side of nuetral. I did the whole "zomg make fun of llp lolz" thing in the past, and to be honest, it got as old as their music.:cool:

[quote=Fei-on]They're skilled musicians
skilled musicians? uuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhh

Yes. I didn't say "talented musicians". I said "skilled musicians". There is a difference between talent and technique. And their songs are catchy. That takes something, to actually write a song that will stick in someone's head from the moment their stereo alarm clock wakes them up all the way till they come home from work that afternoon. There aren't a great deal of bands that can write like that. Listen to the song "One Step Closer" some time. It's actually a really cool song, and very well written, musically.

And I don't see why you'd want to punch me for saying that a certain band isn't godawful. You don't like them, and that's fine, you don't have to. But A LOT of people do. I'd be willing to bet that there are more Linkin Park fans in America than there are Nightwish or any of those. Linkin Park is all over the radio, and MTV. And they're much better than almost anything else currently airing on MTV. That doesn't happen for people who suck.

Too bad MTV has no merit at all anymore.

...wait, it never did.

They sacrifice skill, atmosphere, depth, and true originality for accessibility, that's why they're on MTV. If their purpose is to entertain the masses, then they're doing a damn fine job of it. There's nothing wrong with that, at all. I mean, one of the purposes of music is to entertain. However, I look more into the elements I originally listed and find none of those in their music. This is probably because I have a greater attention span than that of a goldfish.

I don't think I follow you there. They're quite original, in my view. I haven't really heard a band that is comparable to their style. And their songs vary, as well.

It's too bad you here the chorus every 15 seconds in every one of their songs. That's just overdone, no matter how you look at it.

I don't think that's over done. Typical song structure for a Linkin Park song is:

Verse Chorus Verse Chorus Bridge Chorus

Sometimes they'll toss a Chorus at the beginning.

If you think about it, most popular songs are structured like that. It's because it's a good structure. If it wasn't, it wouldn't be so popular. The bands who refuse to use that format and often never go anywhere because most people like the idea. You can say that the people who like it are lame or whatever, but that's not a big deal.

I am a musician, myself. I write a lot of songs. And they often follow that pattern. It's not because I'm trying to please the masses, though. I do a chorus 3 or 4 times in a song because the chorus is the focal point of the song. It carries the main message that the song conveys, which is then supported by verses, and the occasional bridge. And every chorus ought not to sound the same either. You have to mix it up a bit. Maybe change a few words each time, or add a vocal harmony on one of them, or make one a "power chorus" where you just go all out and really drive the message.

[quote=Fei-on]I don't think that's over done. Typical song structure for a Linkin Park song is:

Verse Chorus Verse Chorus Bridge Chorus
Typical structure for a good song is "music music music music music music".

Reading Feions argument should probably clue you lot into the fact that he's right. Most any song you hear on the radio follows that format because it works. Maybe it's not that the bands are sellouts, but that, like, the unsigned bands are for a reason: they're music isn't all that great.

Granted, some of the bands make good music without having a format similar to that, but, I think a lot of you just like glomming onto band that no one has heard of because it appears to be cool or something.

For the record, I think it's just as lame as whoring a successful artist.

The bottom line is, you should listen to what you like because it's good, not to try and follow some trend across society, or even a trend on a video game message board. *cough*

"I dont mind this band. In fact, I would go so far to say that I enjoy some of their son-"

"ZOMG HEATHEN UR SO STUPID I WANT 2 HIT U CUZ UR DUM"


Seriously, I lost a lot of respect for the members who post in this board now, not that means anything to you, of course. I, for one, find most of hte metal **** that you guys seem to jack off to rather boring and repetitive. OH NOES! THEY"RE TECHNICALLY SKILLED MUSICIANS! Who cares? If it isnt entertaining, why bother. But do I come in here and rant about how metal sucks? No. I respect that we have differing tastes, and that hence we wont agree on what does and does not make good music. But for you to assume that what you like is inherently better, and more relevantly on the flip side that what you dislike is inherently inferior is not only silly, but downright immature.

Bottom line is that people have the right to listen to what they want, and for you to make fun of it for no other reason than the fact that you dont like it shows how immature you can be.

LMAO .i have to step in.linkin logs suck and i would change the station if i heard them on the radio because i dont like that emo crud what ever you want to call it.just wanted to say my 2 cents.goodbye

*ban request*

I'm not bothered at all by the whole "lol bandwagon" thing. As someone up there said, it's best to listen to music that you enjoy, and leave it at that. However, subjectively speaking, Linkin Park are absolutely talentless and sound like ****. Thank you.

Fair enough.

When I was in middle school... 4 years ago, I enjoyed them. Now my musical tastes have changed. I

Personally, I found Meteora very entertaining. It's a good album if you can listen to the songs nonstop and not get annoyed. It seems like metal music is a scapegoat a lot of people use to avoid being emo or whatever. Maybe it's a huge frickin' coincidence, but there are a lot of metal fans on this site. Whatever. I listen to the music that I like, and Linkin Park just happened to catch me.

By the way, I listened to half a song of Dream Theater and I noticed they sound a lot like Chevelle, and I like Chevelle.

Also, dude, chinaman is not the prefered nomenclature. Asian american, please.

It still goes back to preference, though. Dont get me wrong, when it comes to deciding which song is more technically impressive, or which group performs the same song better in a test of skill, I would refer to you. But merely being a musician does not make your opinion superoir to anothers. Its all subjective.

End of my argument: Music can be skilled, good, or both. Skilled is an objective measure which trained musicians are more qualified to comment on. Good is a subjective measure of one's reaction to a certain song. Nobody's opinion is superior when it comes to good sin ce it such a subjective measure.

Linkin Park are not skilled, and I (along with a great many people) don't find their music good. end

I'll agree with Klarth and Scott on this one.

But hey, to each his own.

I still don't see how people can enjoy it though :/

Just found this thread...I'm a bit late in the conversation, but anyways...Most of you know how much I love this band. They do such great music. I like most of their songs and mostly "breaking the habits"

I used to like Linkin Park. I still like a few of their songs

[quote=Misoxeny]I think a lot of you just like glomming onto band that no one has heard of because it appears to be cool or something.I've said this several times before... maybe I'm overestimating the average IQ of the boards, but I honestly don't think anyone here is that stupid.

Or maybe I just assume the worst.

Glass half empty, anyone?

[quote=MetalVox]tl;dr - I'd rather have bands be better musicians than be media-whored.

You're supposed to put that BEFORE the huge rant. :\

[quote=flamer]I like most of their songs and mostly "breaking the habits"

Actually, that's the one LP song that I acually like. The rest is trash, though.

Though I don't think of their music as bad, most people who regard Linkin Park as "great music" should probably invest a little effort into broadening their musical horizons.

Oh, I'm not saying that LP is the pinnacle of music, at all. I'm saying that I can tolerate their songs, and after hearing a few times, I find myself singing along simply because I know the words. Hell, I even sing along to a lot music that I hate, simply because I know the words. But I don't hate Linkin Park. They're okay, is all I'm saying. I won't ever buy a Linkin Park CD, or even download a Linkin Park song, but if I'm driving to school, and a LP song comes on the radio, I won't change the station. I wont' crank it up or anything, but I won't turn it off.

Metallica is my band, really.

I know what you're saying, man, really. Do I know what you're saying? Yes, I definitely know what you're saying, and I'm not even playing. Word.

I was mostly directing that last post toward Flame ghost, just in case.

Fair play. I've become numb to this argument, so I guess that in the end, it doesn't even matter. Every time I've looked at this thread, it's just been one step closer to the edge... I think I'm about to break, guys. :(

Hm, clever.

Quite clever.

Oh, can I use some Linkin Park lyrics in my post too?

Let's see...

If you guys don't stop crawling in my skin with this anti-Linkin Park rhetoric, I'm pretty sure that these wounds, they will not heeyul. Seriously, listen to me, you guys. Shut up when I'm talking to you. And for god's sake, don't turn your back on me; I won't be ignored. I've thought about it, and I have no freaking clue how I got this way, but when I thought further, I realized I'd never be allright. So I decided that I'm breaking the habit tonight. The habbit of arguing over whether or not Linkin Park is an awful band. I want to be pushed aside, you guys. So don't tell me you wanted me. In fact, don't even tell me that you thought of me. I won't, I swear I won't. I'll try, I swear I'll -- wait, sorry, got my bands mixed up there.

Needs more proper defense. You suck.

If I have to suffer anymore "clever" stuff the only thing I'll be breaking tonight is someones face.

I lol'd at the last one :(

I thought it was pretty imaginative, but if you dont enjoy it, then I'll stop.

Of course, ripping of the lyrics from a talentless band is obviously SO imaginitive. Following on from that, so is implementing them in the manner which two others have utilised before you.

Just... No.

Hah. Yes.

If they were talentless, they wouldnt be able to play their instruments. And if you try to argue that they cant, then there isnt anything from stopping you from repreating their success.

So either than can play, or you suck worse than LP. :cookie:

[quote]Breaking the habits

Dude, it's Breaking the Habit, no 's' on the end. F*ck it, it bothers me when people make the same mistake over and over and over and don't even realise it, ****it.

*realize

With an s means to make money, as in a busines transaction.

1 entry found for realise.
realise

v 1: earn on some commercial or business transaction; earn as salary or wages; "How much do you make a month in your new job?"; "She earns a lot in her new job"; "this merger brought in lots of money"; "He clears $5,000 each month" [syn: gain, take in, clear, make, earn, realize, pull in, bring in]

Nonetheless, just being skilled doesnt make you popular. If that were the case, Vox would be famous by now, wouldnt he ;)

Note: Not intended as a dig at vox.

why is this thread still here? the lead singer sucks leave it at that

Maybe its here because not everyone agrees, retard.

whats new all anyone does is bicker back and forth any ways.f*ck face

A clever and witty retort. My congratulations on the abilty to sling insults without refuiting the points being made against you. With abilities like that, a job in the current presidentail administration should be within your grasp :cookie:

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v493/cosplaydexterity/PICT0187.jpg[/IMG]

It was my favorite drink coaster. :(

AHAHAHAHHAh roflmfao thats a good way to put it

The puns are becomeing overwhelming.

um no.cant face the truth?

God ****, Dexter is one of the funniest members on this site... :(

Anywho, they're alright. They're no Devin Townsend, or Dream Theater, or Therion, etc. though :(

I say it's a pretty big **** coincidence that all these bands you guys speak of are sooooo good that I've never even heard of them, much less any play on the radio on any station. It must be the internet.

no srsly wtf

YOUR JUST ANOTHER STUPID ****ING SHEEP FLAME GHOST! ****ING SHEEP! BAAAAAH BAHHHHHHHHHHH! ****ING LOSER SHEEP HAHA! IDIOT!

Linkin Park helps me get through tough times, because I feel they really understand me. They combine emotional lyrics that really get to me with the hard rock and metal that I enjoy listening to when I'm not morbidly depressed.

The way you've described it so far, no, there isn't a difference. And even if it was in wording, I think what I said still works. If you want to call it "talent", fine, you're still a consumer, are you not? And by consuming, you are buying into not only the product, but the ideaology behind it (where applicable). And how is this any different than listening to "popular" artists? As far as being a media whore, or "sheep", it isn't at all.

Sorry if I don't really care about the details, but, I am right about the aforementioned comment about radio being for "sheep". Look in the mirror first.

I love seeing the same sides of the same arguments repeated over and over. Especially when it's a stupid discussion. People will listen to whatever they want, no reason justifies this better than another. It's music, it's subjective, period.

If bands were really good, though, they'd get radio play. No, seriously. They'd get radio play. At least once.

Oh, and musicians must be bloody broke if all they want is to get their music out to the world. Just sayin'. :)

Edit: Bands could be technically "good" by all the right reasons, but that doesn't mean they won't sound boring after a while. Probably why a lot of these "good" bands you guys speak of aren't even on popular RADAR.

*Ahem*

You were the one who said "radio is for the masses... masses are like sheep in a slaughterhouse".

How isn't that an economic statement? It boils down to money, clearly. Money for the bands, money for the station, etc, sort of what I hear called "whoring" around here.

So, by comparison, you don't go the way of the "masses" and instead support bands that are "talented". Fair enough. But you still support them, and thusly, you are a "sheep" for buying into it. You think you're apart from the masses, too, from listening to "talented" music, which naturally could never be on the radio, or that's what you suggested, but in reality you're just a part of a different mass. See how that works? You really should 'cause it's incredibly simple.

The details omitted aren't important. You can call it talent, underground, indie, pop, whatever. It doesn't matter in what I'm trying to argue.

So, like, stop arguing because you're quite wrong about pretty much everything in regards to who is and isn't a "sheep".

Hey, there's more than three radio stations, last I checked.

And yeah, music is subjective. It's already been said. I play a **** clarinet and I'm not going to hold my opinion higher than somebody else's just because I can hear that Mariah Carey didn't hold a note as long as she could've or should've for aesthetic purposes. :(

Doesn't that imply that they are just broke musicians, though? Why put out an album in limited quanitities in the first place? Why not do a million live shows instead? Does that mean that if they had money they would put out more albums?

Man, music discussions suck. :(

I will also quote that.

Without quoting it.

For truth.

YOU GUYZ! STOP HIJAKING MY THREAD THIS THRED IS ABOUT LINKIN PARK

I think SOAD is creative. They make good money. Their music hasn't changed a bit. I wish more bands followed that.

[quote=Fate]Their music hasn't changed a bit.
Disagree. Few years ago, I absolutely loved SOAD - favourite band on the ****ing planet. However, this didn't stop me from disliking a good deal of their songs - "War", "Soil", "Pluck", (plus a few others which I forget the names of from their debut album), "Needles", "X", "Bubbles", "Chic 'n' Stu", "A.D.D.", "Pictures" and maybe one or two which I've left out. On the other hand, I used to really, really like "Toxicity", "Aerials", "Spiders" and "Ego Brain". I decided to dig out the CDs again and give 'em a try, and just... It's boring. :/ What's even worse is hearing people blaring their new albums - what the **** kind of song titles are "Violent Pornography"? Have you even read the lyrics to said song? "EVERYBODY ****S!" Come on.

Considering this: Three years ago, I listened to Evanescence and Rage Against The Machine. Go figure.

Oh, and for the "commercialism" side of the argument: Machinae Supremacy's new album was leaked a few days ago, and here's what the band have to say about it:

[quote=Robert]As you all know, Machinae Supremacy is not opposed to "piracy". We support filesharing, and will continue to do so.

Having said that, there are however certain perks that we have grown to enjoy, like the wait for a release, and the initial response from the ones who receive the album. In my mind I see a Machinae Supremacy fan rip open an envelope and put the CD in the stereo/computer while starting to look through the booklet, and getting blown away as the first track begins to play.

If the album is leaked before the release, then part of the fun, the anticipation and the celebratory feelings upon release are lost. It's like the actual release sort of loses its meaning, which is for us kind of like a birthday, or christmas.

What I'm trying to say is simply that I enjoy the idea that the first people hearing it are fans from old, who received the entire package, with full quality sound, the artwork, (the cracked CD-case?), etc. The first impression is the complete impression.

But, I know I'm biased.

Now, if the leaked release is genuine, then the only thing I can say is I really hope you all love it very much. We do. :)

Ohhhh, okay. I see both sides now.

btw, if by any chance you were being sincere, sorry for that rep comment. :D

Their motives shouldn't have anything to do with it is what I'm getting at. :/

I said I get it already. No need to get personal. :mad:

But as a musician, can you see that other people have different tastes, regardless of what you think about technical namby-pamby stuff? I think that's what a lot of people have been restating over and over again.

Yeah, I guess so. But... I think it's a little arrogant to say that your opinion should be held in higher regard. It just sounds kind of mean. :/

And I'm the most vain person ever. Let's be friends.

I personally like whatever music I like, with zero influence from their popularity. Dispatch is one of my favorite bands, and I bet you haven't heard of them. Another one of my favorite bands (probably my absolute favorite) is Metallica, and you've probably heard a lot from them. Like I said, I decide on my own, having no base about popularity.

So just to disprove the theory, Vox and all the other unknown band-liking-guys, you guys should all name a mainstream band that you think is talented. I'm sure you can all think of at least one or two.

Twist what words? Pssh. That's exactly what you've been saying for the entire duration of this thread.

Rolling Stones.

Somehow I forgot The Beatles.

Hey Jude \m/

All classic bands. What about today's bands? I like them Foo Fighters.

I kinda like A Perfect Circle. They have some talent.

And don't forget about Iron Maiden. Still producing fantastic music after 20 years.

I still like Incubus. :)

And Cranky...what about Cranky? (Famous due to 2ch flashes!)

Never heard of 'em.

Guns 'n' Roses. Aerosmith. Bon Jovi. Black Sabbath. Scorpions. The list goes on.

However, let's not forget that the argument isn't about talented mainstream musicians: It's Linkin Park-based. In conclusion, Linkin Park suck throbbing balls. Lock thread.

Linkin Park's meritlessness isn't a theory, it's a given FACT. Big difference.

Oh, that's what his theory was about?

I kinda feel like I just wasted my time...

[size=9]EVERYONE IS WRONG.

DID THEY EVER TEACH YOU ABOUT "SUBJECTIVITY" IN JUDGING ART?

STUDY MORE, PLAY FEWER VIDEOGAMES; GET A CLUE.[/SIZE]

This thread has made me thoroughly sick now. You lot are thicker than I would've hoped.

No, no, no... What I am trying to prove is... Well...

A lot of people are saying that Klarthage, Sabredishmachine, Vox and others. People claim that they only listen to non-mainstream music. People claim that they will stop liking a band's music if that band becomes famous. I was asking the "accused" to disprove that theory by listing off a few mainstream bands that they do like, despite the whole being mainstream thing.

[quote=Misoxeny]EVERYONE IS WRONG

If it's subjectivity you're pushing, you'd probably want to go with the "everyone is right" approach, because in subjectivity issues, there are no wrong answers, hence, everyone is not wrong.

I LEIK IT WHEN LINKIN PARK PLAYS RELALY HARD AND EVERYBDY MOSHES

Jesus, are you people still going on about this?

Some people like Linkin Park, some people don't.

That's all there is to it. Respect eachother's opinions, because neither of you are right nor wrong.

TADA

Yeah, that's been said quite a few times...

It's only at five.

And, anyway, it's subjective, period. There isn't a right or wrong which is why saying Rush is good and Nirvana isn't is stupid. Try saying that you don't like it because of [insert artistic reasoning here] and this board could be taken more seriously.

In the mean time, well, you come off as a lot of 'tards who just wanna be different.

DON'T CONFORM FIGHT THE MAN!

[quote]I kinda like A Perfect Circle. They have some talent.

Oh yes, they're quite wonderful. I'll always have a fondness for their debut album. Nothing wrong with Incubus, either. Last century's Incubus, at least. **Turns around and listens to Ivory Frequency**

[quote=Richaod]Puns truly are the lowest form of humour.

no your mom is

*ahem*

[IMG]http://i1.tinypic.com/ndajco.jpg[/IMG]

I display 40 posts/page.

wow the judge just got PUNK'D

I don't know how your window is set up, but on this site, my browser sets up a new page after 20 posts. Case in point

Misoxeny, you scared?

Well you shouldn't be. You're on scare tactics.

That was so retarded it made me laugh.

You know, Judge, I've had up to here with you.

What Pit's trying to say is,

"I WANT TO HAVE YOUR CHILDREN."

"PLX."

someone sum up all of the arguments from the past 9 pages so I don't have to re-read all that

[spoiler]and use as many adolescent l33t sp33k as possible[/spoiler]

"linkin park sucks"
"IT'S SUBJECTIVE"
"alright, they're talentless"
"IT'S SUBJECTIVE"
"...no it isn't"

Come on, Sabre, you could have use more internet slang in there somewhere.

yah i kno

WHY IS THIS THREAD STILL ALIVE?

The post that answers this question is the last one of the thread, k? K.

Because people are still posting in it?

I'm probably one of the few here that listens to music and doesn't point out great guitar bits and good beats. I just listen, and if I like it, I keep listening. **** all that "technically good" bull****.

Both. In Metallica's "Unforgiven" song, the intro is long and noticeable. I listen to the intricacies of the beats of the intro because the song was built for it. I'm not going to subject every band that has an electric guitar in it to the same scrutiny. In Sean Paul's new song "Temperature," I have no idea what the hell he's saying and I don't think his voice is great, but the beat is nice and catchy. I swear the chorus is repeated like thirty times, but that song is awesome to me because I just like hearing it. It may not be technically impressive, but why would I give a **** if I like listening to it in the first place?

Unforgiven is an awesome song, and I'm glad you mentioned it.

That is all.

[quote=Fei-on]Of Wolf and man was never a single, that I know of, so if it has been overplayed, it's been you doing it.

No, more like my cousin and the rest of the Metallica-obsessing population.

Like Fate, I listen to music I like. I don't care about the techinicalities of it, I just plain enjoy certain things and listen to them. I never listen to music for the purpose of emotions (hence why I don't mind Linkin Park or Slipknot), nor do I care about good guitar work or decent lyrics (hence why I enjoy putting on Korn or Disturbed every once in a while). I listen sheerly for enjoyment, and I don't personally care about technical jargan in music. What sounds good to me is what I like.

hey raptor, just curious but what lame musical phase are you currently skipping around? Is it still the trance thing, or have you moved on to something else that's obscure (in this country).

no, it's just that raptor flaunts just how uncommon his musical tastes are. He does it very vaguely, but you can tell he is.

I like Trance in certain situations. It can get you amped, if you're feeling lethargic.

Well, I certainly haven't observed what I described anywhere on this board. And yes, I did look.

I revoke my comments, for I cannot fight Raptor's logic. Sorry Rappy! I had a bad day and needed a whipping boy!

HOLY CRAP :O last time I was a member on this site I made tons of Linkin Park threads ( them being like my favorite band and all ) but after less then 2 pages of posting it would always get blocked cuz everyone hated them, I'm so shocked this thing is still alive, LINKIN PARK RULEZ

I know I know, alot of people hate thjem but I'm so shocked nothin's gottern out of hand and on the first page theres amore then like 1 person who likes them, anyway that's all I'm saying.

The whole thread is based off LP hate and arguments :/

Theres nothing funnier than hearing two people arguing over which LP cd is the best. Nothing.

their best song was im grounded!! its so deep, meteorangst was amagigng!!